SEASON 1

Protecting Children in Criminal Procedures

In this episode, Juvenile Law Center’s Co-Founder Marsha Levick and Columbia Law Professor Elizabeth Scott discuss the vulnerability of children when they enter the justice system.  Marsha and Elizabeth agree that much has improved since “adult time for adult crime” in the 1990s – today youth are recognized as developmentally different from adults, and with care, may be more easily rehabilitated. However, they argue that there are still improvements to be made, and the problems become obvious when you look at statistics comparing the race of children entering the system.

Listen as the experienced child advocate and juvenile law scholar talk about the current issues and explore state policies and practices that have been implemented to help protect children.

SUPPLEMENTARY RESOURCES

Juvenile Law Center Resources

Explore this extensive resource that includes toolkits and forms, fact sheets, legal research, webinars, and more.

Young Adulthood as a Transitional Legal Category: Science, Social Change and Justice Policy

Scott, Elizabeth S. and Bonnie, Richard J. and Steinberg, Laurence, Science, Social Change and Justice Policy (July 9, 2018). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 2, 2016; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-594.

How Should Justice Policy Treat Young Offenders?

Casey, BJ and Bonnie, Richard J. and Davis, Andre and Faigman, David L. and Hoffman, Morris B. and Jones, Owen D. and Montague, Read and Morse, Stephen J. and Raichle, Marcus E. and Richeson, Jennifer and Scott, Elizabeth S. and Steinberg, Laurence and Taylor-Thompson, Kim A. and Wagner, Anthony D., MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience, February 2017; Vanderbilt Law Research Paper No. 17-9; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 17-17; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-545.

Brain Development, Social Context and Justice Policy

Scott, Elizabeth S. and Duell, Natasha and Steinberg, Laurence, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, Forthcoming, Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-578